CLICK HERE TO RETURN TO LESSONS

THE DIETARY LAWS OF LEVITICUS!

            In the recesses of your mind, you already know what I am about to tell you is true.  There are a gluttony of diet plans in the marketplace!  I mean if you "google" Diet Plans you will find more plans than you can possibly swallow.  There is the South Beach Diet Plan, the Low-Carb Diet Plan, the Idiot Proof Diet Plan, the Eat-and-Lose-Weight Meal Plan, the DASH Eating Plan, the Zone Diet Plan, the All-Natural Diet Plan, the Sonoma Diet Plan, the Rosedale Diet Plan, the Liquid Diet Plan, the Atkins Diet Plan, the  Plan B Diet Plan, the Makers Diet Plan, and the Mediterranean Diet Plan.
      There is undoubtedly others for within two seconds "google" came up with 40,400,000 hits.  In fact, one of the diet plans not listed could be called the Google Diet plan.  That's where you discover that you can lose weight simply by looking for the best diet plan.  I know, because I lost 2 lbs just by combing through many of the articles and I still have over 40,000,000 articles to read!  I figure by the time I'm done reading them that I will weigh less than 100 lbs soaking wet.
      It appears, from what I have read up to this point, that everyone has a diet plan - including God.  While "googling" I discovered that some see Genesis 1:29 as the divine diet plan.  It reads:
And God said, "Look! I have given you the seed-bearing plants throughout the earth and all the fruit trees for your food."1
      Then others look to Leviticus 11 and argue that God never intended for us to be vegetarians.  The real problem, however, is like everyone else on planet Earth  many Christians have "diet plans" on their mind and so they start looking for one in the Bible.  They then stumble on Genesis 1:29 and read too much into it or look at the dietary laws of Leviticus 11 and jump to the conclusion that God's intent was to spell out what was healthy for the Israelites and what should be avoided at all cost.
      Obsessed as we are with diet plans this is an attractive interpretation of Leviticus 11.  And it may well be that God in his providence did give rules that contributed to the physical well-being of the nation.  It would be just like him to watch over us in this way.  But just because we might see some hygienic considerations underlying some of the laws, it doesn't mean that this is what God had in mind when he gave this information to Moses and Aaron. 
      Besides, if this was the intent why didn't God declare poisonous plants to be unclean?  And if health considerations prompted the giving of this chapter to us why did Jesus declare such food as clean in his day?  Finally, it is to be noted that there isn't  a single hint in Leviticus 11 that some animals must be avoided for health reasons.  Nevertheless, if you do all your research on the internet you will conclude that Leviticus 11 is just another diet plan.
      Not so!  The intent of Leviticus 11 is loftier than the physical well-being of Israel; though admittedly good health may be thrown in as a bonus.  At any rate, let's take a look at the chapter.  In vv. 1 - 23, as well as vv. 41 - 47 we read:
      Then the LORD said to Moses and Aaron,  2 "Give the following instructions to the Israelites: The animals you may use for food 3 include those that have completely divided hooves and chew the cud.  4 You may not, however, eat the animals named here because they either have split hooves or chew the cud, but not both. The camel may not be eaten, for though it chews the cud, it does not have split hooves.  5 The same is true of the rock badger 6 and the hare, so they also may never be eaten.  7 And the pig may not be eaten, for though it has split hooves, it does not chew the cud.  8 You may not eat the meat of these animals or touch their dead bodies. They are ceremonially unclean for you.
      "As for marine animals, you may eat whatever has both fins and scales, whether taken from fresh water or salt water.  10 You may not, however, eat marine animals that do not have both fins and scales. You are to detest them,  11 and they will always be forbidden to you. You must never eat their meat or even touch their dead bodies.  12 I repeat, any marine animal that does not have both fins and scales is strictly forbidden to you.
      "These are the birds you must never eat because they are detestable for you: the eagle, the vulture, the osprey,  14 the buzzard, kites of all kinds,  15 ravens of all kinds,  16 the ostrich, the nighthawk, the seagull, hawks of all kinds,  17 the little owl, the cormorant, the great owl,  18 the white owl, the pelican, the carrion vulture,  19 the stork, herons of all kinds, the hoopoe, and the bat.
      "You are to consider detestable all swarming insects that walk along the ground.  21 However, there are some exceptions that you may eat. These include insects that jump with their hind legs:  22 locusts of all varieties, crickets, bald locusts, and grasshoppers. All these may be eaten.  23 But you are to consider detestable all other swarming insects that walk or crawl.
Then dropping down to v. 41 we read:
      "Consider detestable any animal that scurries along the ground; such animals may never be eaten.  42 This includes all animals that slither along on their bellies, as well as those with four legs and those with many feet. All such animals are to be considered detestable.  43 Never defile yourselves by touching such animals.  44 After all, I, the LORD, am your God. You must be holy because I am holy. So do not defile yourselves by touching any of these animals that scurry along the ground.  45 I, the LORD, am the one who brought you up from the land of Egypt to be your God. You must therefore be holy because I am holy.
Lev. 11:46 "These are the instructions regarding the land animals, the birds, and all the living things that move through the water or swarm over the earth,  47 so you can distinguish between what is unclean and may not be eaten and what is clean and may be eaten."
      Because so much of Leviticus reads like a maintenance manuel it is easy to overlook the fact that the narrative of Israel's history frames the law and not vice-versa.  For example, in the next five chapters we will be looking at what is considered clean and not so clean.  But chapters 11, 12, 13, 14, and 15 are framed by chapters 8, 9, and 10 on one side with chapter 16 on the other side.  It is this framework that periodically reminds us that Leviticus is primarily a history book.
      Chapters 8, 9 and 10 told us of Aaron's ordination and the subsequent disobedience of Nadab and Abihu.  Chapter 16 takes us back to the tabernacle to show us God's plan for how he intends to stay in what all-too-often became a polluted neighborhood.
      In the meantime, the following dietary laws were given to Israel:
1. Cloven-hoofed, cud-chewing land animals (such as sheep and cattle) may be eaten.  Other mammals are classified as unclean (such as pigs and camels) and may not be eaten.
2. Only fish with fins and scales may be eaten.  This means trout is out.
3.  Birds of prey, or so it appears, may not be eaten.
4.  Flying insects may not be eaten, hopping insects are edible.
5. Touching the dead carcass of an unclean animal makes a person unclean.
6. Swarming animals, such as mice and lizards. are unclean.  If they are found dead inside a vessel, the vessel becomes unclean and must be destroyed or purified.
7. Clean animals that die of natural causes become unclean, unfit to eat and a source of pollution.2
      These rules about what is clean and unclean are pretty straightforward.  However, the criteria for classifying some as clean and others as unclean is obscure.  So much so that some think God arbitrarily chose some as clean and others as unclean.  Perhaps, but a social anthropologist by the name of Mary Douglas believes otherwise.
      She notes that the animal world is divided into three spheres: those that fly, those that walk, and those that swim.  Each sphere has a particular mode of motion associated with it.  Birds have two wings with which to fly and two feet for walking; fish have fins and scales with which to swim; and land rovers have hoofs with which to walk and run.  The clean animals are those that conform to these standard pure types. Those that somehow transgress what is normal for these types are classified as unclean.  For example, animals with an indeterminate form of motion, i.e. those that swarm, are unclean.
      Picking up on this idea of classifying animals based upon the order of creation, L. R. Kass suggest that the main point is separation.  If Israel was to be holy then it had to learn to make the same distinctions that the Lord made in creation.  Using the principles of place, kind, motion, and form from Genesis 1, Kass believes the classifications in Leviticus 11 were made according to the following guidelines:
1.  Creatures that have no proper or unambiguous place, such as amphibians, are unclean.
2.  Creatures that have no proper form, such as the camel, are unclean.
3.  Creatures that violate proper locomotion, such as water animals that walk, are unclean.
4.  Creatures that violate the original dietary code, showing no respect for life, such as vultures, are unclean.3
      In practice, this meant that in everyday life the Israelites were to learn to distinguish between what was holy and what was common, what was clean and what was unclean.4   
      So, in part, the dietary laws served to remind Israel at every meal that they were a redeemed people.  For their diet was limited to certain meats in imitation of their God who had restricted his choice among the nations to Israel.   But they also reminded Israel that they were to be a holy people.  For they only ate that which behaved as designed, that is, they only ate that which was holy in the sense that it moved within its sphere appropriately and fed on that which was appropriate for its kind.  In short, the dietary laws were an everyday reminder that Israel was called to be a holy people; a people called to live in accordance with the original design.5
      But in practice the dietary laws did more than serve as a day-in and day-out reminder of holiness.  They served as a means of keeping Israel separate from the nations around them.  This was good, and it was bad.  It was good in the sense that it effectively prevented Israel from being unduly influenced by the surrounding nations.  It was bad in the sense that it made it impossible to develop a close relationship with someone with whom you can neither eat nor drink. 
      You and I know from personal experience that local practices about food and drink are very effective in keeping people from different cultures apart from each other.  To sit down for a meal in Chad with the Migaami people, for example, is an in-your-face reminder that others are different; so different that sharing a meal with them is not the most comfortable thing for someone from the outside world to do with ease.  In fact, it is so uncomfortable that it hinders the very things a good meal should bring out - laughter and fellowship.
      In Scripture we see the problem in Genesis 43:32 where Joseph's brother ate at one table while the Egyptians ate at another table.  For some of the animals the Israelites ate with no qualms the Egyptians refused to eat because they were sacred to some deity.  We also see it in Galatians 2 where Peter was initially willing to eat with Gentiles but when some Jewish friends dropped by he caved into peer pressure and separated himself from the Gentiles.
      So the dietary laws were good in that they taught Israel to distinguish between what was holy and what was common.   But in the end they proved to be a significant barrier between the Jews and the Gentiles; a barrier that was removed by Christ.


1     See the attached article entitled God's Diet Plan.
2     Gordon J. Wenham, The Book of Leviticus, William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company,  255 Jefferson Ave. S.E., Grand Rapids, MI 49503, 1979. pp. 165 - 166.
3     Alan P. Ross, Holiness to the Lord, Baker Academic, Grand Rapids, MI 49516, 2002, p. 254.
4     This fits in well with Leviticus 10:10 which reads:  "You must distinguish between the holy and the common, between the unclean and clean."  Granted Moses was addressing the priest but they in turn were to teach the Israelites all the decrees of theLord.
5     It is worth noting that Deuteronomy 14 introduces the dietary laws with a  reference to Israel's election while Leviticus 11 concludes its remarks with similar words.

LEVITICUS - GOD'S GUIDEBOOK TO WORSHIP                 4/02/06    1

CLICK HERE TO RETURN TO LESSONS