CLICK HERE TO RETURN TO LESSONS

THE RECIPIENTS OF PETER'S FIRST LETTER!
      Do you have any minor irritations in your life?  Do you have anything in your life that prompts you to grumble just a little bit but not enough to get you in trouble with anyone?   One of the minor irritations in my life, and certainly in Linda's life, occurs when the telephone rings and the person at the other end of line simply starts talking as if I would immediately recognize their voice.
      I'm trying to pay attention to what they are saying, but half my mind, if not all it, is trying to figure out who in the world is on the other end.  As they continue to speak, I'm kicking myself for not knowing someone who I evidently should obviously know just by the sound of their voice.  I'm also mentally kicking them for not having the courtesy to identify themselves.1
      If I'm lucky ( a word I hesitate to use as Christian) they will quickly remember to identify themselves.  If not, I'm put in the embarrassing position of having to ask  - to whom am I speaking?  Once I know the identity of the person I'm listening to than I can focus on what they are saying and I can put their words into a broader context - which will undoubtedly help me to fully understand the message.  It will also help me  to place some sort of value on the message.  I mean a call from President Bush asking me for a favor is one thing, a call from my neighbor asking for a similar favor is something else.  The former I would consider a prank call, the latter an opportunity to serve my neighbor!
      Well in the New Testament, with the exception of the book of Hebrews, we don't have this problem.  The authors, with only one exception, clearly identify themselves.2     
      We see this in the first verse of I Peter.  Peter identifies himself as the one who is taking the time to write a brief word of encouragement (See 5:12) to others.  We know up front who is at the other end.  This is remarkable for two reasons.
      First, it is clear that Peter was the leader among the apostles and was the founding pastor of First Church in Jerusalem.  Without a doubt he was the most influential figure in the early church.  Others, whether they knew Christ or not, held him in high regard.  With his charismatic personality, with his strong will, and with the spiritual power he had within him, he could have easily promoted himself to a life of ease with little or no regard for those who were struggling with every facet of life.
      Instead, he turned the reigns of First Church over to James, the half-brother of Jesus, and traveled about the country to visit the saints (See Acts 9:32).   We don't know the extent of his travels but it is clear from I Corinthians 1:12 and 9:5 that Peter evidently touched-base with the church in Corinth.  We also know, from sources other than the Bible, that he was crucified in Rome.  Evidently, he and his wife traveled extensively to visit the saints and, perhaps, planted a few churches in the process.
      Now think about what it means to receive a letter from someone like Peter.  Or, look at it this way.   You're ill, you're not doing well and you end up in the hospital.  I drop in to see how you're doing and to pray with you.  Then Les Hirst, our pastor of seniors, drops in and also prays with you.   Your family is appreciative but not surprised.  Then, out of the blue, Billy Graham takes time out of his schedule and comes by to see you.  Which visit do you remember the most?  Which meant the most to you?  Which one most reminded you that you really are special?  Which one would be like receiving a letter from Peter?
      The fact that Peter would take time to write a brief letter of encouragement is remarkable in itself.  But there is a second reason as to why this is remarkable.  It is remarkable because there is no indication that he knew the saints scattered throughout Pontus, Galatia, Cappadocia, Asia, and Bithynia personally.  I mean it is not like Billy Graham visited you in the hospital because he was a longtime friend of the family.  It is because you and he belong to the same family - the family of God.  And for him, that is reason enough.
      So why did Peter, with the help of Silas, write this letter?  As it turns out, we don't have to guess as to the reason.  It is summed up for us in his closing remarks.  In I Peter 5:10 - 14 we read:
      And the God of all grace, who called you to his eternal glory in Christ, after you have suffered a little while, will himself restore you and make you strong, firm and steadfast.  11 To him be the power for ever and ever. Amen.
      With the help of Silas, whom I regard as a faithful brother, I have written to you briefly, encouraging you and testifying that this is the true grace of God. Stand fast in it.3 
      She who is in Babylon, chosen together with you, sends you her greetings, and so does my son Mark.  14 Greet one another with a kiss of love.
      Peace to all of you who are in Christ.
      Peter is confident that the God of all grace, the God whose grace is sufficient for every type of situation, will restore and/or repair each of us so that we are fully fit to enjoy eternal joy in his presence.  In the meantime, our job is to stand fast in the truths of his Word.
      So Peter, who knows something about struggling and falling down, writes to strengthen the saints.  He may not know any of them, but he knows better than anyone else how important it is to have someone come alongside and lift you out of the pit.  For if Jesus had not lifted him up, he would of spent his life on the Sea of Galilee haunted by the fact that things might have been different if he had just stood firm in the midst of trouble.
      And make no mistake about it these saints were in trouble.  They were in trouble for reasons that are simply par for the course.  As a result of believing the gospel, whether it was presented to them by Peter or by Jewish believers who had been scattered, they found themselves at odds with the Roman empire, the city or village in which they lived, their place of employment, and their neighbors.
      The were at odds with their culture because as believers they stopped worshiping the various gods of the empire, their city, their trade guild, and their family.  This change in behavior meant they were unpatriotic. 
      You get a slight hint of what it means to be unpatriotic when someone near you refuses to stand up when the national anthem is played and/or refuses to say the pledge.  Invariably, fingers are pointed at such a person and his or her loyalty is questioned.  This attitude of hostility may result in others simply questioning the actions of such a person or it may result in open hostility.
      In Peter's day to not worship the gods of the culture was a mark of disloyalty.  This meant Christians were considered to be disloyal to their city, unprofessional in their trade since guild meetings usually took place in pagan temples, and haters of their family since household worship was thought to hold the family together.
      This hostility was aggravated by the notion that the culture wasn't really asking Christians to actually believe in the gods but to simply offer token worship as a sign of their familial and civic allegiance.  Those who were so obstinate so as to refuse this simple duty had to be "haters of mankind."
      In addition to being at odds with their culture the recipients of this letter had good reason to believe that they had pretty much been forgotten by the church.  As we have already noted, they knew that they didn't belong to the world.  That is, they knew they were in the world but not of the world.   But it is quite possible, in light of what Peter wrote to them in verses like 2:9, that they didn't quite feel like they were full-fledged citizens of the kingdom of God.  Living north of the Taurus mountain range, north of the most heavily traveled routes of commerce, they were isolated from receiving anything from the church that would have been of encouragement to them.   Hence, and this is only my guess, they were beginning to question not only their true identity, but the worth of their true identity.
      Maybe that is how you feel.  Maybe by choice or by circumstances you are on the outskirts of the kingdom.  As a Christian you know you don't share the same values as your neighbors; you don't share the same work-ethic as your coworkers; and you are certainly not instep with the culture in which you are immersed.  But because of your work schedule, or for some other reason, you are isolated from receiving encouragement from the body of Christ. 
      If so, I Peter is not only for you but for all of us.  It's for all us because in our waywardness we all tend to drift to the outskirts of the kingdom.  Peter's letters will bring us back to the center of God's good and perfect will.    They will remind us of what we already have in Christ.  They will remind us of the perils that lie on the outskirts.  And, his two letters will encourage us to be obedient in a wide variety of circumstances.          
            In the first few verses we read:
      Peter, an apostle of Jesus Christ, To God's elect, strangers in the world, scattered throughout Pontus, Galatia, Cappadocia, Asia and Bithynia, 2 who have been chosen according to the foreknowledge of God the Father, through the sanctifying work of the Spirit, for obedience to Jesus Christ and sprinkling by his blood: Grace and peace be yours in abundance.
      To appreciate these initial verses we need to keep in mind that this letter was written, for the most part, to Gentiles.  Within the letter we learn that the recipients had been released from the futile way of life which they had learned from their fathers (1:18).  The recipients were once not a people were now the people of God (2:10).   And, in previous times the recipients had spent their days and nights doing what pagans do with their days and nights (4:3).
      Now look at the first two verses again.  The amazing thing about these two verses is that Peter takes words and phrases that had originally been applied to God's people - the Israelites - and applies them to these Gentiles.  Peter calls the people to whom he is addressing this letter the elect - God's chosen people.  Regardless of the theological twist you put on these words, the fact remains that these words sound very much like the words Moses applied to the Israelites in the book of Deuteronomy.  For in Deuteronomy 7:6 we read,
"For you are a people holy to the LORD your God. The LORD your God has chosen you out of all the peoples on the face of the earth to be his people, his treasured possession."
      Then too, there is another word here that once exclusively belonged to Israel.  The address literally reads: "To the elect strangers of the Diaspora throughout Pontus, Galatia, Cappadocia, Asia, and Bithynia."  Diaspora, which is sometimes translated as dispersion or scattered was the technical name for the Jews scattered in exile outside the bounds of Palestine.  Sometimes they were forcibly removed and sometimes they scattered of their own free will.  Either way, they were known as the Diaspora.  But now this term is applied to a scattered group of Gentiles on the outskirts of God's kingdom.
      I've been chosen a time or two and I must confess that, for the most part, I have always been chosen last.  I can remember those junior high days when the P. E. teacher would choose two of the best and instruct them to choose sides.  This was a great moment for those who were athletic, but for those of us who were scrawny and totally lacking in ability it was a miserable time to be alive.
      But suppose someone came along and chose you not because you were naturally outstanding but because they loved you and, on top of that, they had the ability to do mighty things on your behalf.  They even had the ability to transform you into a mighty warrior.  Then, choosing doesn't seem like the pits.  In fact, it seems just the opposite!  In my wildest dreams it seems like Tom Landry chose me out of the draft and said, "Come with me and I will make you an unbelievable quarterback."  In fact, that is exactly what happened.  He chose me and made be an unbelievable quarterback!
      There is tremendous encouragement in these words for the word eklektos was a word used to describe anything that was especially chosen.  It was used to describe specially chosen fruit.  It was used to describe especially chosen clothes that were well made.  It was also used too describe hand-picked troops.   But there is also a challenge, or a reminder here.  We were chosen for a purpose.  We were chosen to be obedient and in being obedient to fulfill God's purposes in and through our life.
      Oh man! I knew there was a catch.  This is where we want to suggest to God that he might want to choose someone else.  Because in actual fact we've never been good at doing what we're supposed to be doing.  But at this point we still don't get it.  In God's choosing us, he also chose to consecrate us by the work of the Holy Spirit within us.  It is the Spirit who awakens our longings to be on God's side.  It is the Spirit who frees us from the grip of sin.  It is the Spirit who works obedience into us.  And it is this Spirit who equips us to do God's work on the outskirts of his kingdom.  Wow!  Now being chosen sounds like a very good thing.


1     My mother, for example, never identified herself when she called me.  Of course, I was her son and she rightly expected me to automatically know that it was her on the other end of the line.  But what my mom never took into account was that after I was married, Linda became my personal secretary and she, as part of her duties, answered the phone.  Naturally, she didn't automatically know it was my mom and, as you can guess, this was quite irritating.  Which explains why I am now my own personal secretary.  As for Linda, she only lasted for one week - as my personal secretary.
2     I, II, and III John are not an exception as everyone understood that these letters were from John.  Perhaps because he was the only apostle still living at the time!
3     Some try to reconcile the Peter they find in the gospel accounts - the one who habitually put his foot in his mouth - with the Peter who supposedly wrote the book of I Peter.   They look at the Peter who normally blurted out the first thing that came into his mind  and deduce that whoever wrote the book of I Peter, it wasn't Peter.
      The book of Acts, however, serves as the best defense of Peter's authorship for I and II Peter.  In clear Greek, Luke shows Peter as a capable and articulate spokesperson for the early church.  It tells us that the local authorities, the very ones who would have been the quickest to find fault with him, were astonished at his graciousness, at his persuasiveness, and at his self-controlled speech.   The history of the early church gives us every reason to believe that the author of I Peter is - Peter.

PETER: THE MAN AND HIS LETTERS                                  11/25/07    1

CLICK HERE TO RETURN TO LESSONS